Tapani,

These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right?   I think we should be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our efforts to seek fairer compliance actions for registrants, compliance actions that fall within the scope of ICANN, and compliance actions responsive to the needs of the whole community (not a subset).

This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain provide it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about compliance. Would anyone else like to help craft a question for the board? (Please respond privately.)

Best, Kathy

On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote:

Dear all,

As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking
Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you.

So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather
impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by
the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated.

Tapani

On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

NCUC members,

Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with the
stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG):

1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in
CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2?  What could the Board or ICANN
organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of this
work?
2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group?


They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board meeting.

This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty to
ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG about
these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer our
input to that thread.

Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our
questions!

Best


Farzaneh