+1 on this On 24 Mar 2017 19:25, "Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I think you’ve done a great job shepherding this statement and I support > it. > > It would be inexcusable for NCSG not to be able to weigh in with comments > on this. > > > > --MM > > > > *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of > *Ayden Férdeline > *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:22 PM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: [DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review > > > > I didn't realise I wrote to the NCSG-Discuss list earlier. What is with my > emailing today? (Well a mobile device...) > > > > Thanks for these comments, Stefi, and for reading the blog post. For now > my priority is to continue editing the Statement, revising it > to accommodate some very legitimate points which have been made, and then > coming back to the PC list to see who is comfortable endorsing it. I would > hope an endorsement was forthcoming but I know that outcome is not a > forgone conclusion, and that is understandable (if disappointing). > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Ayden Férdeline > > Sent from ProtonMail Mobile > > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12 pm, Milan, Stefania <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > Dear Ayden, thanks for taking care of this. I have read and enjoyed your > blog post. > I have not read the report in question, and I feel a have very little > ground to move any objection--so I feel also uncomfortable at supporting it > unless 2/3 of the PC members approve. Does it make sense? > Anyhow thanks for your great great work! Stefania > ps and good luck with fixing laptop!! > ________________________________________ > Da: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> per conto di Ayden > Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> > Inviato: giovedì 23 marzo 2017 13.12.43 > A: [log in to unmask] > Oggetto: Re: [DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review > > Hi, > > We need to get something out by tomorrow, as that is the deadline. I am > currently laptopless with my MacBook getting its battery replaced today, so > I'm stuck making edits through Google Docs on my iPhone :/ That said, I'll > be working on a second draft today and refining a few of the points, as I'm > not happy with the document as it stands. I have published a blog post on > the Report itself which basically sums up where I stand on the Review: > > http://www.internetgovernance.org/2017/03/23/re-thinking- > icanns-at-large-community/ > > I hope this is useful. > > Best wishes, > > Ayden > > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:08 pm, Martin Pablo Silva Valent < > [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > Ayden, any deadline or idea towards when it will, if, submitted? I am > travelling this week. > > Cheers, > Martin > > On 21 Mar 2017 15:52, "Ayden Férdeline" <[log in to unmask]<mailto: > [log in to unmask]>> wrote: > Greetings all, > > I have drafted up on Google Docs<https://docs.google.com/ > document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing> > some comments on behalf of the NCSG regarding the Review of the At-Large > community. This is a really rough draft, and I'd welcome your feedback on > what arguments should be refined, what I might have missed, or what we > might want to remain silent on. I'm not happy with it at the moment, but I > figured it would be better to get some words down onto paper, and we can > refine this together... so please take a read of the proposed statement > here<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb- > Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing>, with the understanding > that it's definitely a work-in-progress. And please share your thoughts, > either in the document itself or on this mailing list! > > Comments are due in three days, so we don't have too long to get this > together unfortunately. You can read the draft report here< > https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge- > review-draft-report-31jan17-en.pdf> (PDF link) if you haven't seen it > already. > > A friendly note to those ALAC members who read the NCSG mailing list: this > statement is a work-in-progress, it has not been endorsed yet by the NCSG > Policy Committee, and it will likely change between now and the time it is > submitted (if it is submitted). > > Best wishes, > > Ayden Férdeline > linkedin.com/in/ferdeline<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline> > > > > > The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to > which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, > forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this > information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is > prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received > this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the > material from any computer. > >