+1 on this

On 24 Mar 2017 19:25, "Mueller, Milton L" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> I think you’ve done a great job shepherding this statement and I support
> it.
>
> It would be inexcusable for NCSG not to be able to weigh in with comments
> on this.
>
>
>
> --MM
>
>
>
> *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of
> *Ayden Férdeline
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 23, 2017 7:22 PM
> *To:* [log in to unmask]
> *Subject:* Re: [DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review
>
>
>
> I didn't realise I wrote to the NCSG-Discuss list earlier. What is with my
> emailing today? (Well a mobile device...)
>
>
>
> Thanks for these comments, Stefi, and for reading the blog post. For now
> my priority is to continue editing the Statement, revising it
> to accommodate some very legitimate points which have been made, and then
> coming back to the PC list to see who is comfortable endorsing it. I would
> hope an endorsement was forthcoming but I know that outcome is not a
> forgone conclusion, and that is understandable (if disappointing).
>
>
>
> Best wishes,
>
>
>
> Ayden Férdeline
>
> Sent from ProtonMail Mobile
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12 pm, Milan, Stefania <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Ayden, thanks for taking care of this. I have read and enjoyed your
> blog post.
> I have not read the report in question, and I feel a have very little
> ground to move any objection--so I feel also uncomfortable at supporting it
> unless 2/3 of the PC members approve. Does it make sense?
> Anyhow thanks for your great great work! Stefania
> ps and good luck with fixing laptop!!
> ________________________________________
> Da: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> per conto di Ayden
> Férdeline <[log in to unmask]>
> Inviato: giovedì 23 marzo 2017 13.12.43
> A: [log in to unmask]
> Oggetto: Re: [DRAFT] NCSG Statement on the ALAC Review
>
> Hi,
>
> We need to get something out by tomorrow, as that is the deadline. I am
> currently laptopless with my MacBook getting its battery replaced today, so
> I'm stuck making edits through Google Docs on my iPhone :/ That said, I'll
> be working on a second draft today and refining a few of the points, as I'm
> not happy with the document as it stands. I have published a blog post on
> the Report itself which basically sums up where I stand on the Review:
>
> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2017/03/23/re-thinking-
> icanns-at-large-community/
>
> I hope this is useful.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:08 pm, Martin Pablo Silva Valent <
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Ayden, any deadline or idea towards when it will, if, submitted? I am
> travelling this week.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
> On 21 Mar 2017 15:52, "Ayden Férdeline" <[log in to unmask]<mailto:
> [log in to unmask]>> wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> I have drafted up on Google Docs<https://docs.google.com/
> document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing>
> some comments on behalf of the NCSG regarding the Review of the At-Large
> community. This is a really rough draft, and I'd welcome your feedback on
> what arguments should be refined, what I might have missed, or what we
> might want to remain silent on. I'm not happy with it at the moment, but I
> figured it would be better to get some words down onto paper, and we can
> refine this together... so please take a read of the proposed statement
> here<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZgdafZs4KBENsb-
> Kl9GO0l_Bh4gYdQd6F-ORpZPr27s/edit?usp=sharing>, with the understanding
> that it's definitely a work-in-progress. And please share your thoughts,
> either in the document itself or on this mailing list!
>
> Comments are due in three days, so we don't have too long to get this
> together unfortunately. You can read the draft report here<
> https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/atlarge-
> review-draft-report-31jan17-en.pdf> (PDF link) if you haven't seen it
> already.
>
> A friendly note to those ALAC members who read the NCSG mailing list: this
> statement is a work-in-progress, it has not been endorsed yet by the NCSG
> Policy Committee, and it will likely change between now and the time it is
> submitted (if it is submitted).
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Ayden Férdeline
> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline<http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>
>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged
> material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution,
> forwarding, or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this
> information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> prohibited without the express permission of the sender. If you received
> this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the
> material from any computer.
>
>