Arsene, I by-passed the first page and went to the next page. Joan On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Arsène Tungali <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > That's a shame! I would rather not fill in this survey! > > ----------------- > Arsène Tungali, > @arsenebaguma > +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967> > GPG: 523644A0 > Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo > > Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos) > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask] > <[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > I agree with your sentiments, Joan, as to the purpose of this exercise, > but I would just like to add that is not possible to anonymise this data > set. In addition to the fields we can see, I suspect the survey platform is > collecting IP addresses, the date and time of submission, details on the > browser, and other fingerprints which could be used to re-identify the > respondent. This is particularly true given the volume of text boxes > (versus multiple choice options) present, which allows for one's sentence > structure / style to be analysed, and the likely small number of > respondents. I think it is misleading for the consultants behind this > survey to claim that they will anonymise the responses. They do not have > the ability to do so. > > Ayden > > > -------- Original Message -------- > Subject: Re: CCWG Accountability Work Stream2: please complete the > Ombudsman Survey > Local Time: 20 April 2017 2:56 PM > UTC Time: 20 April 2017 13:56 > From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > > Thanks Farzi. > > It's important that surveys remain anonymous and the focus is on the > response and critical input not the collection of personal data. > Cheers, > Joan > > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:24 AM, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> I will relay this to the WS2 ombuds group. >> >> Best >> >> Farzaneh >> >> Farzaneh >> >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Joan Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Dorothy, >>> I was so surprise that the personal questions were there too. Even at >>> the completion, they asked for your information if you want the review. >>> Joan >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:29 PM, dorothy g <[log in to unmask]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Interesting, I clicked open the survey and it asks for personal >>>> information which it says will not be given to ICANN. Why do I need to give >>>> my personal information to this third party? >>>> >>>> best >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Maryam Bakoshi < >>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As part of the CCWG Accountability Work Stream 2 assignments, the >>>>> ICANN Office of the Ombudsman is currently being assessed by an independent >>>>> assessor. It would be great if you could spare 5-10min maximum to take part >>>>> in the survey that closes at the end of this week. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Survey link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/3462816/ICANN >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Kind regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nathalie >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nathalie Peregrine >>>>> >>>>> Specialist, SOAC Support (GNSO) >>>>> >>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >>>>> >>>>> Email: [log in to unmask] >>>>> <http:[log in to unmask]> >>>>> >>>>> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and >>>>> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages >>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DgMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=-d9m4sr16OXloyLjz4TF6npbe51hgE0EHtoX1U6WUOA&s=Bw2Uzbh2Pu1X0lObLtbwtN5ZNEP3ECdPAfcqzVvIOYE&e=> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >