Arsene,

I by-passed the first page and went to the next page.

Joan

On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Arsène Tungali <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> That's a shame! I would rather not fill in this survey!
>
> -----------------
> Arsène Tungali,
> @arsenebaguma
> +243 993810967 <+243%20993%20810%20967>
> GPG: 523644A0
> Goma, Democratic Republic of Congo
>
> Sent from my iPhone (excuse typos)
>
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 4:05 PM, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]
> <[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
>
> I agree with your sentiments, Joan, as to the purpose of this exercise,
> but I would just like to add that is not possible to anonymise this data
> set. In addition to the fields we can see, I suspect the survey platform is
> collecting IP addresses, the date and time of submission, details on the
> browser, and other fingerprints which could be used to re-identify the
> respondent. This is particularly true given the volume of text boxes
> (versus multiple choice options) present, which allows for one's sentence
> structure / style to be analysed, and the likely small number of
> respondents. I think it is misleading for the consultants behind this
> survey to claim that they will anonymise the responses. They do not have
> the ability to do so.
>
> Ayden
>
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: CCWG Accountability Work Stream2: please complete the
> Ombudsman Survey
> Local Time: 20 April 2017 2:56 PM
> UTC Time: 20 April 2017 13:56
> From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
>
> Thanks Farzi.
>
> It's important that surveys remain anonymous and the focus is on the
> response and critical input not the collection of personal data.
> Cheers,
> Joan
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:24 AM, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]>
> wrote:
>
>> I will relay this to the WS2 ombuds group.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> Farzaneh
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Joan Kerr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dorothy,
>>> I was so surprise that the personal questions were there too.  Even at
>>> the completion, they asked for your information if you want the review.
>>> Joan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:29 PM, dorothy g <[log in to unmask]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Interesting,  I clicked open the survey and it asks for personal
>>>> information which it says will not be given to ICANN. Why do I need to give
>>>> my personal information to this third party?
>>>>
>>>> best
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:00 PM, Maryam Bakoshi <
>>>> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As part of the CCWG Accountability Work Stream 2 assignments, the
>>>>> ICANN Office of the Ombudsman is currently being assessed by an independent
>>>>> assessor. It would be great if you could spare 5-10min maximum to take part
>>>>> in the survey that closes at the end of this week.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Survey link: http://www.surveygizmo.com/s3/3462816/ICANN
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nathalie
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Nathalie Peregrine
>>>>>
>>>>> Specialist, SOAC Support (GNSO)
>>>>>
>>>>> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>>>>>
>>>>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>>>>> <http:[log in to unmask]>
>>>>>
>>>>> Skype: nathalie.peregrine.icann
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses and
>>>>> visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
>>>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__gnso.icann.org_sites_gnso.icann.org_files_gnso_presentations_policy-2Defforts.htm-23newcomers&d=DgMFAg&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=PDd_FX3f4MVgkEIi9GHvVoUhbecsvLhgsyXrxgtbL10DTBs0i1jYiBM_uTSDzgqG&m=-d9m4sr16OXloyLjz4TF6npbe51hgE0EHtoX1U6WUOA&s=Bw2Uzbh2Pu1X0lObLtbwtN5ZNEP3ECdPAfcqzVvIOYE&e=>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>