Thanks, Julf. That would be very helpful for the PC to be able to objectively select from those whove expressed interest. @Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele <[log in to unmask]> @John Gbadamosi <[log in to unmask]> @Bruna Martins dos Santos <[log in to unmask]> @[log in to unmask] can you provide a description of your familiarity with Organizational Reviews and knowledge of continuous improvement work either within or outside of ICANN? Warmly, Tomslin On Sat, 4 Nov 2023, 00:17 Johan Helsingius, <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I would suggest volunteers / candidates describe their familiarity with > Organizational Reviews and knowledge of continuous improvement work > outside of ICANN. > > Julf > > > On 02/11/2023 20:28, Tomslin Samme-Nlar wrote: > > Dear members, > > > > The Continuous Improvement Program Community Coordination Group > > (CIP-CCG) terms of reference calls for each SO, AC, GNSO Stakeholder > > Group, and Regional At-Large Organization (RALO) to appoint one (1) > > representative to the Group. > > > > Regarding the representative, the ToR recommends the following > > skill/expertise: > > > > "*It will be useful to have some representatives with familiarity with > > Organizational Reviews, but also representatives with knowledge of > > continuous improvement work outside of ICANN; those that can contribute > > new and innovative ideas for improving the effectiveness and the > > accountability of the different ICANN structures*." > > If anyone would like to volunteer, please let me know by Tuesday 7th > > November for the PC to evaluate. > > > > _*More info on CIP-CCG:*_ > > > > The Third Accountability and Transparency Review (ATRT3) Recommendation > > 3.6 calls for Organizational Reviews to be evolved into a Continuous > > Improvement Program (CIP). The recommendation to create a Continuous > > Improvement Program states that ICANN org shall work with each > > Supporting Organization (SO), Advisory Committee (AC) and their > > stakeholder groups, and the Nominating Committee (NomCom) to establish a > > Continuous Improvement Program. It will include an annual satisfaction > > survey of members/participants, and a regular assessment, including a > > summary of continuous improvements published at least every three years. > > > > As the ICANN Community considers the implementation of ATRT3 > > Recommendation 3.6 as it relates to each community structure and for the > > ICANN Community overall, the CIP Community Coordination Group is > > intended to serve as a forum to exchange best practices, lessons > > learned, as well as for sharing information and progress related to > > already existing community continuous improvement activities. The > > representatives in the CIP-CCG will share best practices and collaborate > > on community-wide implementation of ATRT3 Recommendation 3.6, while > > relaying information back to their constituencies to inform the process > > and voice decisions. > > > > Warmly, > > Tomslin > > > >