Dear NCSG members,

We had a (incomplete) discussion on the mailing list as early as 4 days ago regarding the SubPro Small team Plus idea. @farzaneh badii articulated why NCSG shouldn't encourage nor support the idea and @Kathy Kleiman argued that we have reason to support the idea. If you didn't or missed the discussion, please search the list for the following topic to catch up: Re: Fwd: [council] [GNSO-SubProPendingRecs-ST] Point of Order - Sub Pro Pending Recommendations Small Team Work

In that same discussion, @Stephanie Perrin requested help from our members to join it since the Small Team Plus will move ahead. You will find below an official request for subject matter experts (1 expert and 1 alternate) to join the Small Team Plus.

My question to you as policy chair is, should we proceed to appoint an expert as requested by the small team? If yes, who would love to volunteer as the expert to the small team and who as an alternate?

Please let the policy committee know.

Warmly,
Tomslin


-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject:        Call for Subject Matter Experts | SubPro Pending
Recommendations Small team
Date:   Thu, 9 Nov 2023 00:53:41 +0000
From:   Devan Reed <[log in to unmask]>
To:     [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>, Andrea Glandon
<[log in to unmask]>
CC:     [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>, Paul Mcgrady -- Valid
email <[log in to unmask]>, Steve Chan <[log in to unmask]>, Julie
Hedlund <[log in to unmask]>



**Please note, the NCSG is able to put forward 3 Subject Matter
Experts/Alternates.

Dear Julf,

As you may be aware, the GNSO Council has tasked
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yDgWIwKZqKk0WY0q7CS2pf7aD4VupCWV/edit>
the SubPro Pending Recommendations Small team to develop proposed
modifications to the SubPro non-adopted Board recommendations to attempt
to address the Board’s concerns.

Each group is hereby invited to put forward one subject matter expert
plus alternate to help inform this assignment, in addition to the
Council member or liaison that may already be a member of the small team
(see here <https://community.icann.org/x/nQP5DQ> for current
membership). Please note, the NCSG is able to put forward three Subject
Matter Experts/Alternates. The small team assignment form
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yDgWIwKZqKk0WY0q7CS2pf7aD4VupCWV/edit>
foresees that: “At a minimum, SMEs are expected to be familiar, or
familiarize themselves, with the SubPro Initial Report and Final Report
sections on these specific topics as well as small team deliberations to
date,” so it is up to you to determine what you consider to be
“expertise” in this context.

As we recognize that your group may not be interested in every single
topic or may have different SMEs it would like to assign depending on
the topic, we would like to encourage you to review the workplan that
has been included at the bottom of this message that outlines the
proposed planning and scheduling of topics.

*_Please communicate by 17 November at the latest the names of the SME
and alternate that your group is putting forward to
[log in to unmask]* Please also indicate if the SME is only joining
for a specific topic or topics. The first meeting of the small team plus
will take place on 27 November at 14.00 UTC.

As a reminder, the small team plus has been tasked to develop proposed
modifications that are focused on addressing the Board’s concerns. This
is not an opportunity to bring new issues to the table or reopen
previous conversations. As a result, the deliberations are expected to
be focused, narrow, and swift. To facilitate the work of the small team,
dedicated briefings will be provided for each topic to ensure that
members have the relevant information available. In addition, the
current small team members are working on draft proposals that are
intended to help kick-start the deliberations.

Please also note that there will be other opportunities for input. At a
minimum, it is the expectation that the small team plus will host a prep
week session to brief the community on the proposed changes to the
recommendations which is then followed by an ICANN79 session to obtain
community feedback before the final Supplemental Recommendations are
submitted to the GNSO Council.

*When*



*What *



*Whom*

27 Nov



- Introduction of new members & overview of approach & next steps

- Commence review of Recommendation 17.2 (expanding scope of financial
support)



Small Team Plus

4 Dec



- Recommendation 17.2 (expanding scope of financial support) – continue
deliberations

- Commence review of Recommendation 22.7 (exemption from Continued
Operations Instrument (COI))



Small Team Plus

11 Dec



- Recommendation 17.2 (expanding scope of financial support) – finalize
deliberations

- Recommendation 22.7 (exemption from Continued Operations Instrument
(COI)) – finalize proposed modification

- Commence review of Recommendation 24.3 (updating standards of
confusing similarity and string contention) & Recommendation 24.5
(single / plurals)



Small Team Plus

18 Dec



- Recommendation 24.3 (updating standards of confusing similarity and
string contention) & Recommendation 24.5 (single / plurals) – continue
deliberations



Small Team Plus

8 Jan



- Recommendation 24.3 (updating standards of confusing similarity and
string contention) & Recommendation 24.5 (single / plurals) – finalize
deliberations

- Commence review of Recommendation 9.2 (Single Registrant Exemption /
Waiver)



Small Team Plus

15 Jan



- Recommendation 9.2 (Single Registrant Exemption / Waiver) – deliberate
proposed modification



Small Team Plus

22 Jan



- Recommendation 9.2 (Single Registrant Exemption / Waiver) – finalize
proposed modification

- Commence review of recommendation 18.1 (rejection of applications) &
recommendation 18.3 (covenant not to sue) in combination with
Recommendation 32.1 (mechanism that allows specific parties to challenge
or appeal), Recommendation 32.2 (clear procedures and rules for
challenge/appeal processes) and Recommendation 32.10 (mechanism should
not does not cause excessive, unnecessary costs or delays in the
application process)



Small Team Plus

29 Jan



- Recommendation 18.1 (rejection of applications) & recommendation 18.3
(covenant not to sue) in combination with Recommendation 32.1 (mechanism
that allows specific parties to challenge or appeal), Recommendation
32.2 (clear procedures and rules for challenge/appeal processes) and
Recommendation 32.10 (mechanism should not does not cause excessive,
unnecessary costs or delays in the application process) – continue
deliberations



Small Team Plus

5 Feb



- Recommendation 18.1 (rejection of applications) & recommendation 18.3
(covenant not to sue) in combination with Recommendation 32.1 (mechanism
that allows specific parties to challenge or appeal), Recommendation
32.2 (clear procedures and rules for challenge/appeal processes) and
Recommendation 32.10 (mechanism should not does not cause excessive,
unnecessary costs or delays in the application process) – continue
deliberations



Small Team Plus

12 Feb



- Recommendation 18.1 (rejection of applications) & recommendation 18.3
(covenant not to sue) in combination with Recommendation 32.1 (mechanism
that allows specific parties to challenge or appeal), Recommendation
32.2 (clear procedures and rules for challenge/appeal processes) and
Recommendation 32.10 (mechanism should not does not cause excessive,
unnecessary costs or delays in the application process) – continue
deliberations



Small Team Plus

19 Feb



- Recommendation 18.1 (rejection of applications) & recommendation 18.3
(covenant not to sue) in combination with Recommendation 32.1 (mechanism
that allows specific parties to challenge or appeal), Recommendation
32.2 (clear procedures and rules for challenge/appeal processes) and
Recommendation 32.10 (mechanism should not does not cause excessive,
unnecessary costs or delays in the application process) – finalize
deliberations



Small Team Plus

Week of 19 Feb (TBC)



- Prep week session to brief community on proposed changes to
recommendations



Small Team Plus

2-7 March

ICANN79



- ICANN79 session to obtain community feedback on proposed changes to
recommendations



Small Team Plus

18 March



- Review of community feedback & updating of proposed modifications as
deemed appropriate



Small Team Plus

25 March



- Continued review of community feedback & updating of proposed
modifications as deemed appropriate



Small Team Plus

1 April



- Finalize review & updates of proposed modifications



Small Team Plus

Week of 1 April



- Submit Supplemental Recommendations (modified recommendations) to the
GNSO Council for its consideration



Small Team Lead

April Council meeting



- Council consideration of Supplemental Recommendations



Council

After April Council meeting



- Assuming Council adoption, submission to the ICANN Board of the
Supplemental Recommendations



GNSO Secretariat

May / June



- Board consideration of Supplemental Recommendations



ICANN Board

Thank you.

Kind regards,

*Devan Reed*
Secretariat Operations Coordinator

Policy Development Team
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

www.icann.org
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.icann.org&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=5Q2VHFiILluU8bvJHD3YjtNb84SyquCx2HSNHYn1ybs&m=X5iO0FCI3T2FxZ0KhKQ1iY0GhPzLH7XaiK8LfLcHSPY&s=grheVbJRc-hQqrXXGzMqUK3Htr0S5Z74HFOhmrag-Js&e=>

signature_34675794