Hi Benjamin,
The Contracted Party House (CPH) is open to also having an NCUC point of contact, if NCUC so wishes. However, this specific request is certainly not a capacity development engagement but a contribution to their house's DNS Abuse efforts. Whether it leads to policy development is unknown at this point. Also, whether they are open to capacity development or not is something that needs to be discussed with them.
Warmly,
Tomslin
Tomslin
Dear Tomslin,Thank you for your email Tomslin, I have a few questions, does this call for volunteers require NCUC to send a representative? Does the idea of technical capacity building for members about DNS Abuse fall under the projects CPH is open to? or is this strictly a policy-making process?I would like to know if this would help move forward the stalled NCUC DNS Abuse webinar, as discussed in the joint session.Kind regards,BenjaminI am also fairly new and glad to learn. Perhaps I could shadow or back up in a way.Thank you,PeterThank you, Frank. Noted.Warmly,
TomslinDear Tomslin,--I am interested and I am new to it, so I would gladly partner with Farzaneh.Thank youBest regardsFrank Anati, CCNA CyberOps, CCNA, GCP ACE, CySA+, Sec+, Net+, A+
IT Specialist
0241396393 Office0261771239 Mobile
P. O. Box UP 1720, Kumasi, Ghana
@frankqwame
https://www.linkedin.com/in/frank-anati
