Thanks Romina El lun, 18 dic 2023 a las 15:24, Peter Micek (<[log in to unmask]>) escribió: > Agreed, this is a great exercise. I like the idea of using this simple > template to evaluate more policies and statements. > > Thanks, > Peter > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023, 1:10 PM Benjamin Akinmoyeje <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> Dear Farzaneh, >> Great idea, I hope you will consider the NCUC website as a great place to >> publish the blog. >> >> This is an important topic that many of our members are passionate about. >> >> Kind regards, >> Benjamin >> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 7:40 PM farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]> >> wrote: >> >>> Thank you Ephraim. >>> >>> I am going to turn this into a blog. If the policy committee and NCSG >>> decides to turn it into a letter getting broader feedback from the >>> membership and send it to the board that would be great. >>> >>> Policy Committee can you please have a look at this? >>> >>> Farzaneh >>> >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:17 AM Ephraim Percy Kenyanito < >>> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> >>>> Awesome stuff Farzaneh! >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Ephraim Percy Kenyanito >>>> Public Policy Specialist/ Regulatory Affairs Specialist/ Project >>>> Manager- >>>> International Trade, Technology, Media & Telecommunications Laws >>>> Website: https://ekenyanito.com/ >>>> Twitter: @ekenyanito <https://twitter.com/ekenyanito> >>>> PGP Fingerprint: B0FA394AF73DEB7AA1FDC7360CFED26DE6BA8DC1 >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, 17 Dec 2023 at 02:46, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi NCSG >>>>> >>>>> I have started doing HRIA on GAC Communiques. I started with a >>>>> Communique in Cancun. >>>>> >>>>> If NCSG and NCSG Policy Committee wants to, they can send this (with >>>>> amendments and comments) as a letter to the Board. I am hopefully going to >>>>> periodically do that and the next one is the GAC communique on urgent >>>>> requests. Link to document to comment on: >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kmXgKaob7lIULB_6dXIepeZ7l2e6AzAJcfzAhuBKSEg/edit?usp=sharing >>>>> >>>>> The text: >>>>> >>>>> Governments asking for confidentiality of law enforcement requests for >>>>> access to domain name registrants personal, private data: A human rights >>>>> impact assessment >>>>> >>>>> WHOIS Disclosure System >>>>> >>>>> a. The GAC advises the Board: >>>>> >>>>> i. To direct ICANN org to promptly engage with the PSWG to identify >>>>> and advance >>>>> >>>>> solutions for confidentiality of law enforcement requests so as not to >>>>> preclude >>>>> >>>>> participation by law enforcement requesters when measuring usage of >>>>> the WHOIS >>>>> >>>>> Disclosure System. >>>>> >>>>> Governmental Advisory Committee/ Cancun, Mexico, 2023 >>>>> <https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/gac-to-icann-20mar23-en.pdf> >>>>> >>>>> Sources used: Business Social Responsibility Rapid Human Rights >>>>> Assessment: >>>>> https://www.bsr.org/files/BSR-Rapid-HRDD-Political-Armed-Conflict-Tool.pdf >>>>> >>>>> Rapid human rights impact assessment: >>>>> >>>>> The situation: WHOIS is the directory that includes the domain name >>>>> registrants private, personal, sensitive data such as phone numbers, >>>>> physical addresses and email addresses. Domain name owners can set up >>>>> websites around the world. This database was public and accessible for >>>>> years until General Data Protection Regulation came into effect which >>>>> required redaction of data. However, GDPR also had provisions for >>>>> disclosing the private data to third parties with a legitimate purpose. >>>>> GDPR is vague on how such disclosure can take place. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Rightsholders: Rightsholders in this situation are domain name >>>>> registrants. >>>>> >>>>> Impacted vulnerable communities: potential impacted communities can >>>>> be minority groups that discuss sensitive issues on their blog that are >>>>> unfairly illegal in their countries. Such as minority religious groups, >>>>> minority political oppositions and others. >>>>> >>>>> What is the severity of the actual or potential human rights impact? >>>>> >>>>> Unfair arrest, potential imprisonment, illegal house raids, cruel >>>>> punishments >>>>> >>>>> What are the potential long-term implications of the situation? >>>>> >>>>> Decrease in use of domain names and public websites for exercising >>>>> fundamental rights >>>>> >>>>> Inaccuracy of the database >>>>> >>>>> Peer companies that are taking action that the company can consult >>>>> with directly? >>>>> >>>>> Regional Internet Registries that have similar WHOIS databases do not >>>>> make the requests confidential, they report on which countries asked for >>>>> the data in their transparency reports (See RIPE NCC) >>>>> https://www.ripe.net/publications/lea-documents >>>>> >>>>> What can ICANN do to avoid, prevent, or mitigate the actual or >>>>> potential human rights impacts? >>>>> >>>>> ICANN should not grant law enforcement agencies the option to seek >>>>> disclosure of data confidentially from the registrars. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Farzaneh >>>>> >>>>