Hi Emmanuel,

Thanks for the reminder. We didn't get any interest in writing a comment on
this in NCSG. My question to you as our rep to the WG is, is there anything
in the final report that we should be concerned about and that necessitates
a comment?

Warmly,
Tomslin



On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 23:52, Emmanuel Vitus <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Dear all,
> This is a final reminder to submit comments
> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/phase-1-final-report-of-the-epdp-on-internationalized-domain-names-23-01-2024>
> on the EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names Phase 1 Final Report
> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/correspondence/epdp-idns2-leadership-team-et-al-to-gnso-council-et-al-08nov23-en.pdf>.
> The report, which addresses key issues such as top-level gTLD definition
> and variant management, will close for comments tomorrow.
>
> The EPDP Team proposes sixty-nine (69) recommendations related to the New
> gTLD Program, covering areas from application fees to contractual
> requirements. This is the last step before the board decides.
>
> Best,
> Emmanuel
>