Hello Tomslin. There are no issues of concern for us as a stakeholder group. There's no need for further comments from our end. Kind regards, Emmanuel Sent from Mobile device. Excuse brevity and typos. On Wed 13 Mar 2024 at 03:50, Tomslin Samme-Nlar <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi Emmanuel, > > Thanks for the reminder. We didn't get any interest in writing a comment > on this in NCSG. My question to you as our rep to the WG is, is there > anything in the final report that we should be concerned about and that > necessitates a comment? > > Warmly, > Tomslin > > > > On Tue, 12 Mar 2024 at 23:52, Emmanuel Vitus <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> Dear all, >> This is a final reminder to submit comments >> <https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/phase-1-final-report-of-the-epdp-on-internationalized-domain-names-23-01-2024> >> on the EPDP on Internationalized Domain Names Phase 1 Final Report >> <https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/policy/2023/correspondence/epdp-idns2-leadership-team-et-al-to-gnso-council-et-al-08nov23-en.pdf>. >> The report, which addresses key issues such as top-level gTLD definition >> and variant management, will close for comments tomorrow. >> >> The EPDP Team proposes sixty-nine (69) recommendations related to the New >> gTLD Program, covering areas from application fees to contractual >> requirements. This is the last step before the board decides. >> >> Best, >> Emmanuel >> >