well said Farz
thanks for sharing
___________________
REMMY NWEKE,  mNUJ, mNGE, mGOCOP
Lead Consulting Strategist/Group Executive Editor,
ITREALMS Media group [Multiple-award winning medium]
Former Vice President, African Civil Society on Information Society (ACSIS)
______________________________________________________________
*Confidentiality Notice:* The information in this document and attachments 
are confidential and may also be privileged information. It is intended 
only for the use of the named recipient. Remmy Nweke does not accept legal 
responsibility for the contents of this e-mail. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please notify me immediately, then delete this document and do 
not disclose the contents of this document to any other person, nor make 
any copies. Violators may face court persecution.


On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 9:19 PM farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

what I am going to say:

How many reports you receive shouldnt be a success measure. How many reports you took action on should not be the measure for success. The measure for success should be qualitative. In the criminal justice system we used these outcome oriented measures and put people in jail and got tough on crime while violating human rights and didn’t even fix the system. Lets not do that in dns space. What we want from these amendments are solid due process structures, meaningful transparency reports on the categories of abuse . We also want the amendment to bring clarity and safeguards for keeping the dns abuse limited and technical and not lead to web service and content regulation. We want to see you observe how/if  these amendments impact the Internet (so Internet impact assessment) and human rights. 

Farzaneh