I agree names should not be discussed.

Also, if I remember correctly, the rep is chosen by the consticuency but
does not _represent_ the consticuency.  That is to say, the
representative is an independent agent -- albeit one chosen for
particular expertise.

Is my understanding correct?

Harold

Adam Peake wrote:

> At 12:28 AM +0900 4/28/04, Adam Peake wrote:
>
>>
>> Date:         Tue, 27 Apr 2004 10:23:45 -0400
>> Reply-To:     Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sender:       Non-Commercial User Constituency
>> <[log in to unmask]>
>> From:         Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject:      Re: Fwd: 2004 Nominating Committee - Invitation
>> X-cc:         [log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>> Content-Disposition: inline
>>
>>
>> Why don't Adam and Robin give us some sense of why they
>> want to do this, and specific ideas about what they hope to
>> accomplish, including specific names they would like to get
>> on the Board if possible.
>
>
>
> No, I don't think we should suggest names. Please look at the
> noncom's procedures
> <http://www.icann.org/committees/nom-comm/procedures-10apr03.htm> (A.
> and A.2.)
>
> Late here, I'll send a note about the other items tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>