To me, good public policy would always favor some sort of appeals
process. Yes, decisions won't always improve, but it provide some force
toward more fairness and consistency. It depends, of course, on the
structure and arena of the appeal.

The main conflicting public interest in considering how to set it up
is, it seems to me, the need to drive toward finality. No one wins when
an appeals process delays decisions interminably.

Rick

____________________________
What do people on this list think of having UDRP appeals?
Pro: outrageously bad decisions might get reversed more easily.
Con: good decisions might get reversed. Undermines
role of courts and national law.