LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Sender:	NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:	Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:04:31 +1300
Reply-To:	Joy Liddicoat <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:	<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Questions/Options for Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top Level
From:	Joy Liddicoat <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:	7bit
In-Reply-To:	<p06230901cb5f8ab6d2d8@[10.0.1.2]>
Content-Type:	text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:	1.0
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (24 lines)

Apologies for any confusion - I should have made that option 8, not 7....
Joy
-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Dan
Krimm
Sent: Tuesday, 14 February 2012 4:54 p.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Questions/Options for Protection of IOC/Red Cross Names at Top
Level

At 3:27 PM +1300 2/14/12, Joy Liddicoat wrote:

>Perhaps, if there is no agreement there is an option 7: The specific 
>names are locked and no-one can have them ;)

I actually like this one a lot!  :-)

Dan


--
Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone and do
not necessarily reflect any position of the author's employer.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU