Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:34:26 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 20 Dec 2011, at 17:00, Joy Liddicoat wrote:
> but I hope that NPOC members do not feel they need to have an agreed “position” before providing input – this is an open dialogue to which all NCSG members are free to contribute.
I am glad you said that. I think that while constituency positions are important, it is in the nature of NCSG that each member of a constituency is first a member of NCSG, and would be a member of the NCSG even if they quit being a member of any constituency. Members of this stakeholder group are members of NCSG first and members of a constituency second, third and fourth. And for some of our members, being a member of the NCSG is sufficient, they do not belong to constituencies. I expect this class of members will grow over time.
This make the NCSG list a rich space were opinions that may not fit the consensus process on one or another constituency can still be expressed as the viewpoint of an NCSG member. I think that is important.
avri
|
|
|