LISTSERV - NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	NCSG-DISCUSS Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: ALAC comment on the Proposed Applicant Guidebook
From:	Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 6 Dec 2010 21:53:46 -0600
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (16 lines)

On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We could produce a short support statement that says we support the points, but that we do not accept further delay of the program and suggest that issues re remedied within the next 60 days.
>
> or something similar.

+1.

Not 100% sure I agree with the entire ALAC statement, but it is really
concerning that several items magically landed and/or got twisted in
the process of going from the DAG to the PAG.

Regards
Jorge

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.SYR.EDU