Too late, oh well.
BD
Robin Gross wrote:
> Thanks, Bill.
>
> I think we should endorse the statement to NTIA since we haven't had a
> chance to file our own.
>
> Thanks,
> Robin
>
>
> On Jun 8, 2009, at 4:00 AM, William Drake wrote:
>
>> I missed the suggestion below from Milton so am forwarding now.
>>
>> The IGF Internet Governance Caucus, of which many of us here are
>> members, is submitting comments to NTIA on the JPA. Since we didn't
>> manage to do our own, I asked whether it was possible for NCUC to
>> sign on to the IGC's, and people seemed fine with that.
>> Unfortunately, comments are due today so we'd have to decide very
>> quickly.
>>
>> Would it be possible to get quick consensus on endorsing the
>> statement below, or should we just let it go?
>>
>> Bill
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>>> *From: *"carlos a. afonso" <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>> *Date: *June 8, 2009 12:39:45 PM GMT+02:00
>>> *To: *"Non-Commercial Users Constituency Executive Committee & GNSO
>>> Reps. Discussion" <[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>, "Milton L Mueller"
>>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>> *Subject: **Re: [Ncu-exec] Fwd: [governance] CONSENSUS CALL - JPA
>>> statement*
>>> *Reply-To: *"Non-Commercial Users Constituency Executive Committee &
>>> GNSO Reps. Discussion" <[log in to unmask]
>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>>
>>> Yes, I think NCUC should endorse it.
>>>
>>> --c.a.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>> To: "Non-Commercial Users Constituency Executive Committee & GNSO Reps.
>>> Discussion" <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>> Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:52:10 -0400
>>> Subject: Re: [Ncu-exec] Fwd: [governance] CONSENSUS CALL - JPA statement
>>>
>>>> Sure, why not send this to the discuss list?
>>>>
>>>> ________________________________
>>>> From: [log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of William Drake
>>>> Sent: Saturday, June 06, 2009 7:48 AM
>>>> To: NCUC EC-Council List
>>>> Subject: [Ncu-exec] Fwd: [governance] CONSENSUS CALL - JPA statement
>>>>
>>>> NCUC didn't manage amidst other stuff to do a statement on JPA.
>>>> Would we want to endorse the IGC statement? I doubt anyone in IGC
>>>> would object. But we'd have to decide quickly...
>>>>
>>>> Just a thought, it'd be a small pity for NCUC to be silent.
>>>>
>>>> BD
>>>>
>>>> Begin forwarded message:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: Ian Peter
>>>> <[log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>>> Date: June 5, 2009 11:54:35 PM GMT+02:00
>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>"
>>>> <[log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>>> Subject: [governance] CONSENSUS CALL - JPA statement
>>>> Reply-To:
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>,Ian
>>>> Peter
>>>> <[log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>>>
>>>> Below is the final statement we propose to send to DOC (and need to
>>>> submit by June 8). Please indicate YES or NO as regards your support
>>>> for this statement - if you have already indicated in the previous
>>>> draft a YES, there is no need to vote again (in the interests of
>>>> email flow). At this stage I am assuming we have a consensus for this
>>>> unless strong objections are raised in the next 48 hours.
>>>>
>>>> At this stage no amendments can be accepted which changes the meaning
>>>> or emphasis of the text. However we can certainly consider simple
>>>> changes that clarify the expression if you feel strongly about them.
>>>>
>>>> Thank you everyone for your participation!
>>>>
>>>> DRAFT FOLLOWS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Internet Governance Caucus is a global coalition of civil society
>>>> and non governmental organisations and individuals actively involved
>>>> the UN's Internet Governance Forum (IGF) process. Formed during the
>>>> lead up to the World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS), our
>>>> mission is to provide a forum for discussion, advocacy, action, and
>>>> for representation of civil society contributions in Internet
>>>> governance processes. We have several hundred members, with a wide
>>>> spread of geographic representation; more about our coalition can be
>>>> found at www.igcaucus.org
>>>> <http://www.igcaucus.org><http://www.igcaucus.org>.
>>>>
>>>> We are thankful for the opportunity to comment on the Joint Project
>>>> Agreement (JPA) with ICANN, and respectfully submit as follows.
>>>>
>>>> In responding to your call for comments, we are mindful of the WSIS
>>>> principles, which " recognize that Internet governance, carried out
>>>> according to the Geneva principles, is an essential element for a
>>>> people-centred, inclusive, development-oriented and
>>>> non-discriminatory Information Society". We also recognise the need
>>>> for high levels of global co-operation from all stakeholder groups to
>>>> ensure Internet stability and security.
>>>>
>>>> On your question as regards the future of the JPA - The IGC firmly
>>>> believes that global co-operation will be enhanced by a transition
>>>> beyond the JPA to a situation where all stakeholders feel that they
>>>> have equitable arrangements for participation, that ICANN is subject
>>>> to due process procedures and is accountable to all stakeholders.
>>>> Therefore, the IGC believes that merely extending the current JPA
>>>> arrangement is not a lasting viable solution.
>>>>
>>>> Some of us believe the JPA should be ended now, as it is an
>>>> ineffective mechanism to deal with the problems that must be resolved
>>>> to place ICANN on a viable long-term path forward. On the other hand,
>>>> some of us believe that a time-limited extension of the JPA might be
>>>> the most effective means to ensure that ICANN does take on board
>>>> necessary changes.
>>>>
>>>> Irrespective of when the JPA actually ends however, the IGC believes
>>>> that it should be replaced by a new global accountability framework,
>>>> the development of which should commence as soon as possible in an
>>>> open, multistakeholder, transparent and inclusive process.
>>>>
>>>> Also irrespective of whether the JPA continues or not, we believe
>>>> that certain principles outlined below need to be embedded in ICANN's
>>>> operation. We believe these should be covered by an undertaking by
>>>> ICANN to perpetuate in its constitution, by laws, or some similar
>>>> accountability mechanism, the principles which follow. The principles
>>>> need to be embedded in such a way as to ensure they cannot easily be
>>>> changed to exclude any stakeholder group. The principles which need
>>>> to be permanently embedded are:
>>>>
>>>> * bottom up co-ordination
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * balanced multi stakeholder representation, including civil
>>>> society interests and Internet users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * ensuring the stability of the Internet
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * transparency
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * appropriate accountability mechanisms
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * continuing evolution of an effective and appropriate
>>>> governance model which is multilateral, multistakeholder, democratic,
>>>> and transparent
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * decision making driven by the public interest
>>>>
>>>> We also propose to replace "private sector management" with
>>>> multistakeholder management, which has evolved from the World Summit
>>>> on the Information Society and the Internet Governance Forum process
>>>> which the US Government has supported, and which is an important
>>>> facet, we believe, of effective internet governance arrangements.
>>>>
>>>> We think the establishment of firm principles to guide the evolution
>>>> of a model is the appropriate way to proceed. This should explicitly
>>>> recognize that ICANN is a global governance institution with
>>>> regulatory authority over an industry (domain name registration) and
>>>> over critical resources (IP addresses, root servers and addresses).
>>>> The standards of due process, rights, and accountability that apply
>>>> to ICANN must be developed with these facts in mind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ian Peter and Ginger Paque, Co-coordinators, for the Internet
>>>> Governance Caucus
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>>> To be removed from the list, send any message to:
>>>>
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:governance-unsubscribe@l
>>>> ists.cpsr.org>
>>>>
>>>> For all list information and functions, see:
>>>> http://lists.cpsr.org/lists/info/governance
>>>>
>>
>> ***********************************************************
>> William J. Drake
>> Senior Associate
>> Centre for International Governance
>> Graduate Institute of International and
>> Development Studies
>> Geneva, Switzerland
>> [log in to unmask]
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
>> <http://www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html>
>> ***********************************************************
>>
>
>
>
>
> IP JUSTICE
> Robin Gross, Executive Director
> 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
> p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
> w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: [log in to unmask]
> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
--
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
[log in to unmask]
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
**********************************************************
|
