NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 4 Oct 2009 00:01:43 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (62 lines)
Yes, Robin, when people like me say that ICANN isn't accountable to anyone we know that the Board has ultimate decision making power but the issue is to whom are THEY accountable? 

A corporate board is accountable to the shareholders. 

Most Cal. Non Profit Public Benefits are accountable to a membership. 

ICANN has no members. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Non-Commercial User Constituency [mailto:NCUC-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jorge Amodio
> Sent: Saturday, October 03, 2009 7:39 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCUC-DISCUSS] OReilly Media on "ICANN without restraints:
> the difficulties of coordinating stakeholders"
> 
> Thanks for the clarification Robin. Then am I right saying that besides
> the
> BoD under the law the organization is not accountable to its
> constituents ?
> 
> Regards
> Jorge
> 
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> > On Oct 3, 2009, at 7:21 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > I'm not an attorney so correct me if I'm wrong. As far as I know being
> ICANN
> > a non-profit CA corp with no institutional "members", legally besides to
> the
> > Attorney General, ICANN still is accountable to ... nobody ?
> > [...]
> >
> > Technically, ICANN is a California not-for-profit corporation so it is
> > primarily accountable to its corporate board of directors.  Under the
> law,
> > the buck stops with them because they have a fiduciary obligation to
> make
> > informed decisions that serve the public interest.   If they fail, one
> could
> > appeal to the California Attorney General's Office who over-sees
> California
> > nonprofits.  One could also complain to the US Federal government
> because of
> > ICANN's 501(c)(3) tax status it must be meet certain standards of
> > accountability and public benefit.   And ICANN can be sued in legal
> courts,
> > most easily in California, just like any other nonprofit corporation for
> > breach of its legal obligations.
> > Robin
> >
> > IP JUSTICE
> > Robin Gross, Executive Director
> > 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA  94117  USA
> > p: +1-415-553-6261    f: +1-415-462-6451
> > w: http://www.ipjustice.org     e: [log in to unmask]
> >
> >
> >

ATOM RSS1 RSS2