All

On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Milton, et all,
>
> While I support the general idea and the spirit of the comments I feel
> that there is too much extra cheese for the nachos talking about what
> ICANN should be or not should be and what the BoD should do and not
> should do, I strongly believe that we should cut to the cheese and
> simply say that ICANN must follow its processes developed by its
> constituencies and accept the outcome of the IRP as the safeguard for
> accountability.
>
> IMHO, going on and on with the XXX, pornography, and free speech song,
> it's what keeps the "content" or "nature" of the TLD on everybody's
> minds and fuels the public discussion pushing it away from what's the
> core issue here.

I agree with Jorge on all of the above.


-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel