I will be arriving on the 24th.  Count me in.

Roy Balleste
Law Library Director
Associate Professor of Law
St. Thomas University
16401 NW 37th Avenue
Miami Gardens, FL 33054  USA
1-305-623-2341

-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Alex Gakuru
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2011 7:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: IGF and us

Hi Bill,

I would be delighted to organise an outreach event! NCUCers coming
over just holla.

Karibu Kenya!

Alex

On 7/14/11, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> There could be some interesting synergy possibilities between the IGF
and
> the ICANNsphere this time, e.g. with the new gTLD & JAS issues taken
up in
> the main sessions, the Katim-instigated initiatve on ICANN &
developing
> countries percolating pre-Dakar, etc.  Maybe something could be done
along
> the lines of the outreach event Alex organized for the Nairobi ICANN,
albeit
> on a smaller scale, and/or drawing on the SF workshop format...?
>
> I'll be there from Friday 23 Sept. Meetings (GigaNet, APC, ISOC, the
> ministerial) start Monday 26th, IGF from the 27th.  If anyone else
will be
> around Sat-Sun 24-25 and interested in making something happen, I'd be
happy
> to join the effort.
>
> Best
>
> Bill
>
> On Jul 4, 2011, at 2:01 PM, Carlos A. Afonso wrote:
>
>> Carissimi,
>>
>> The IGF is approaching. Whatever our views on it, some of us will be
>> there in some capacity (mostly in the workshops, I guess). Could we
>> think of something among us as NCUC/NCSG taking advantage of being
there
>> -- maybe some face-to-face agenda regarding the ICANN process
pre-Senegal?
>>
>> First of, we would need to know who will be there.
>>
>> []s fraternos
>>
>> --c.a.
>>
>> On 07/03/2011 07:57 PM, Nicolas Adam wrote:
>>> Thank you both.
>>>
>>> I agree that we should keep our propositions for the Review, but i
was
>>> glad to be able to read some of them in advance.
>>>
>>> Nicolas
>>>
>>> On 7/3/2011 10:40 AM, Milton L Mueller wrote:
>>>> KK:
>>>> Thanks for making the comments better. However, on the issue of
>>>> proposing specific substantive and procedural changes, I think it
>>>> would be a tactical mistake to do so in this round of comments. I
>>>> think the main issue now is whether the review takes place at all.
We
>>>> should not, in my opinion, let other groups know what we would
>>>> consider acceptable changes until we are actually in a review.
>>>>
>>>> You will recall that in Singapore we agreed to work on a reference
>>>> document regarding what changes would be ideal from our point of
view.
>>>> I still believe that work should proceed on that document, but it
>>>> should not be confused with the comments on the need for a review,
imho.
>>>>
>>>> --MM
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Konstantinos Komaitis [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, July 03, 2011 6:48 AM
>>>>> To: Milton L Mueller; [log in to unmask]
>>>>> Subject: Re: proposed comments on UDRP
>>>>> Importance: High
>>>>>
>>>>> I am sending a draft with my additions on the substantive and
>>>>> procedural
>>>>> changes we would like to see in the UDRP. Apologies if I went a
bit
>>>>> overboard here, but as you may many of these issues are covered in
my
>>>>> book - so I tried to include them without being academically
pedantic.
>>>>>
>>>>> May I suggest we use this document as our master copy and I have
also
>>>>> uploaded it in a piratepad version
(http://piratepad.net/sNv8ukSm1V)
>>>>> for
>>>>> those who do use open source software.
>>>>>
>>>>> The deadline for submission is July 15 and I can submit them. May
I,
>>>>> therefore, have all your suggestions/recommendations no later than
July
>>>>> 14, 2011.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> KK
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Milton L Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>>>> Reply-To: Milton L
Mueller<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>>>> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 11:30:01 +0100
>>>>> To: "[log in to unmask]<mailto:NCSG-NCUC-
>>>>> [log in to unmask]>"<NCSG-NCUC-
>>>>>
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>>>>> Subject: proposed comments on UDRP
>>>>>
>>>>> Please consider the attached document my contribution to the
effort. It
>>>>> gets us started. I do not have time to do much more, so I hope
others
>>>>> can finish it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Milton L. Mueller
>>>>> Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies
Internet
>>>>> Governance Project http://blog.internetgovernance.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device