Is it the URL or the actual web page you are talking about?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: NCSG-NCUC [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 12:52 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NCSG-NCUC-DISCUSS] more news on ICANN Ombudsman Frank
> Fowlie's air rage incident & cover-up attempt
> 
> Hi,
> 
> No.
> 
> But it could be tracked as a electronic communication transactional
> record and if this list ever advocated 'mutiny' or some other dastardly
> deed, you could be linked to it.
> 
> a.
> 
> On 4 Aug 2010, at 12:41, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> 
> >>> The F.B.I. contends that the e-mail addresses to which people send
> >>> messages, and the Web pages they visit, are the functional
> equivalent of the
> >>> phone numbers they call. Officials familiar with the matter,
> speaking
> >>> anonymously because of the sensitivity of the issue, say that most
> companies
> >>> agree with that interpretation and have routinely turned over such
> records
> >>> when requested.
> >>
> >> The web pages people visit: "the functional equivalent of the phone
> numbers
> >> they call"?!?
> >
> > So if you send a message to an electronic mail list like this one is
> > it considered some sort of mutiny   ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Jorge