On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 9:28 PM, Alain Berranger
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Excellent suggestion!

Only 1:
Maintain the status quo and not provide any new special protections
for the RCRC/IOC names (i.e., no changes to the current schedule of
second-level reserved names in the new gTLD Registry Agreement).

will work for me.



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel