Mime-Version: |
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:54:42 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
In-Reply-To: |
<p06240809cb18a5c368fd@[192.168.1.160]> |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 22 Dec 2011, at 04:24, Adam Peake wrote:
> Perhaps push harder against olympic, but give if
> have to with assurance of no further creep, must
> be written in stone...
There is no writing in stone.
Every decision brings its own bit of creep.
And that is a reason for being very careful.
But yes, giving where one must is good advice.
But knowing when that is the case is tough.
I tend to think we should be removing names, such as ICANN/IANA etc, from the reserved list, not adding them. But we had a WG during the new gTLD PDP that did not make these decisions - either for adding or deleting. So I find all of the efforts to add names now, problematic and to be avoided unless we open up a PDP process that looks at the entire issue again, including all the geo names that ICANN has forced onto the list without a PDP to authorize the action.
avri
|
|
|