NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-NCUC <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Marc Perkel <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Nov 2010 19:05:16 -0600
Reply-To:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: U.S. Government Seizes BitTorrent Search Engine Domain and More
From:
Jorge Amodio <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines) 
> So was it ICANN that actually did the seizing?

ICANN has no operational knobs it can tweak at the 2nd+ level. Verisign does.

I'd really like if some of the numerous reports citing a Court order
provide more information about it or a link, so far I'm still trying
to find a concrete reference or the actual order.

Both the .com (supposedly seized) and the .info (still working) are
registered by the same person with address in Egypt.

Regards
Jorge

ATOM RSS1 RSS2