Thanks

Like I mentioned here a little while back: while I used to have a very 
busy RSS feed roll and I would follow closely many things Icann-related 
and a great many number of related subjects, I nowadays only have time 
for what you here suggest.

So ... thank you for sharing Brendon.

Nicolas


On 17/04/2014 12:20 PM, Brenden Kuerbis wrote:
> In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with 
> transition of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on how 
> ICANN has attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing a 
> narrow Scoping Document:
>
> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/
>
> The IGP thinks this is wrong.  Yesterday, the European Commission 
> agreed with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation in 
> the scope of the discussion."
>
> Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined 
> version of the document, which revises the scope according to the 
> NTIA's announcement:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit
>
> We invite your comments or suggestions.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org