Sender: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:24:17 -0400 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I think there's room for constructive engagement, and I would welcome
it. From how and what you say below, I am convince that you can do so
diplomatically.
Nicolas
On 23/10/2012 3:31 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>
> Now, a question: What is the preference here towards the level of my
> participation? Is it that I stay relatively quiet except for
> specifically-defined points of joint engagement? Or is it OK if I
> occasionally wade into discussions, giving (my own personal take on)
> the ALAC perspective on issues that we have worked upon. If so
> engaged, will always indicate when an opinion is my own, based on a
> formal ALAC statement, or on my own reading of the mood of the
> At-Large Community. I'm OK to engage at any level. While such PoVs may
> at times differ from the prevailing mood of NCSG, it's not my intent
> to be disruptive.
|
|
|