NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
marie-laure Lemineur <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
marie-laure Lemineur <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:33:19 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Dear all,

Generally speaking, it is obviously key to monitor aspects such as
transparency and accountability. In my experience, I have observed
that the more transparent an organization/government is, the more it
tends to increase confidence in this particular
organization/government.  I would add that another aspect that
particularly worries me is the fact that part of the recommendations
of the first ATRT team have not yet been implemented by ICANN.
Therefore I am hoping that, the future recommendations of the
soon-to-be constituted ATRT 2 in addition to responding to the
fulfillment of a contractual obligation, will be fully considered and
implemented by the Board once issued.

Regards,

Marie-laure

 ATRT team, a contractual requirement would be fulfilled  Therefore
some questions



On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:33 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 21 Jan 2013, at 16:48, Robin Gross wrote:
>
>> Therefore now have a 24-hour period to ask the two NCSG candidates questions and to provide them with initial feedback about desired outcomes for the ATRT (using this list beginning now).
>>
>
>
> Thanks Robin, for opening this topic.
>
> I think that the AOC reviews are among the most important work we do outside of Policy recommendations.  And I think that the ATRT - being responsible for reviewing, and then recommending  improvements on, the accountability and transparency of ICANN is central to any evolution we might someday see ICANN and its ability to become a free standing dynamic organization.
>
> Even if this list does not have any specific questions for the two of us who have asked for the NCSG endorsement, I would really like to hear about issues that are currently on people's minds about the specific issues that need to be covered by the upcoming review.
>
> Thanks
>
> avri
>
> Ps: Dan, I remember that I owe you an answer on Dynamic Organizational Architectures which includes the issue of accountability.  While I am still working on that theoretical answer, in a practical sense, I think that accountable and transparent Accountability and Transparency Reviews, are a key ingredient.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2