Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 8 Aug 2016 09:49:04 -0600 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
right
it is not part of the 800 or so sector members……
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 8 Aug 2016, at 9:15, avri doria wrote:
> As far as I know ICANN is not a sector member of the ITU.
>
> avri
>
>
> On 08-Aug-16 09:44, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
>> I see a few hundred of stakeholders in ITU (Sector members). Even
>> ISOC. But I don’t see ICANN
>>
>>
>> https://www.itu.int/online/mm/scripts/gensel11
>>
>>
>> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
>> +506 8837 7176
>> Skype: carlos.raulg
>> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
>> On 8 Aug 2016, at 7:14, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
>>
>>> And ICANN is a "stakeholder without standing" in the ITU. As Internet
>>> governance comes of age it will transpire in many locations and at
>>> many levels.
>>> Just like stakeholders within ICANN, ICANN will have to figure out
>>> how to be everywhere almost all the time to deal with policy issues
>>> that impinge on its remit.
>>>
>>> Sam L.
>>>
>>> On 2016-08-07 8:47 PM, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> But I guess GAC has less well-defined institutional dynamics than
>>>>> ITU. Is that
>>>>> the difference you're getting at? -- I'm no expert on ITU either...)
>>>>>
>>>>> Or, are we now considering governments "stakeholders" too? If so,
>>>>> why not
>>>>> just make GAC a garden-variety SG in GNSO? The "GSG" -- Government
>>>>> Stakeholder Group?
>>>> Bingo. That's what is happening.
>>>>
>>>>> I may not be expert in the implications of the term of art
>>>>> "multilateral"
>>>>> but I honestly don't see much difference in ICANN being whip-tailed
>>>>> by GAC or
>>>>> ITU if the dynamic is comparable. Can you elaborate on this
>>>>> distinction?
>>>> The difference is that an ICANN completely dominated by governments
>>>> is worse than the ITU because ICANN has global hierarchical power
>>>> over the DNS, whereas as a treaty-based organization the ITU cannot
>>>> make any sovereign member do something it doesn't want to do. When
>>>> ICANN imposes rules on how DNS works however, it has global effect.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> *--------------------------------------------*
>>> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
>>> in an unjust state" -Confucius
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
>>> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
>>> YorkU email: [log in to unmask] Skype: slanfranco
>>> blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
>>> Phone: 613 476-0429 cell: 416-816-2852
>>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
|
|
|