Hi,

On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy
> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November
> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would
> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are
> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any
> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
>
> I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing



Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted"

I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes:

"Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted"


Then it is fine by me.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel