Sender: |
|
X-To: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:55:41 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Message-ID: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Avri,
Removing a director, or the whole darn board, is a blend of ex post
action and a warning to directors about director behavior.
But it falls well short of the kind of ongoing board accountability that
is exercised by shareholders in a for-profit organization.
I am NOT suggesting a move to shareholders. We do have to keep the
ongoing board accountability issue alive in our concerns.
Sam L.
On 3/8/2017 10:46 AM, avri doria wrote:
> On 08-Mar-17 10:40, Sam Lanfranco wrote:
>> In short, the core issue is how to actually make the ICANN board
>> subject to ongoing accountability to its stakeholders. Making elected
>> board members responsible to their constituencies would barely scratch
>> the surface of that problem.
> isn't that the purpose of the ability of the ICANN EC to remove a director?
>
> avri
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
------------------------------------------------
"It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured
in an unjust state" -Confucius
邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也
------------------------------------------------
Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar)
Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3
email: [log in to unmask] Skype: slanfranco
blog: https://samlanfranco.blogspot.com
Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852
|
|
|