HI BK,

Is a purely intergov soultion then in scope for IGP?  for the EC?

just curious



On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Brenden Kuerbis
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> In case you missed it, or simply haven't had time to keep up with transition
> of the IANA functions debate, we have a new article on how ICANN has
> attempted to preempt discussion of options by issuing a narrow Scoping
> Document:
>
> http://www.internetgovernance.org/2014/04/16/icann-anything-that-doesnt-give-iana-to-me-is-out-of-scope/
>
> The IGP thinks this is wrong.  Yesterday, the European Commission agreed
> with that, saying "there should be no artificial limitation in the scope of
> the discussion."
>
> Toward the end of the article, we provide a link for a redlined version of
> the document, which revises the scope according to the NTIA's announcement:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nYQwmfTB52fLwT88RpAyGd3kD69rBLXbnG5zi5IT9yw/edit
>
> We invite your comments or suggestions.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------
> Brenden Kuerbis
> Internet Governance Project
> http://internetgovernance.org



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel