Hi,

Objections have been filed, and people have had to respond to them (or not as they chose), even if they weren't through the Initial Evaluation first.

Strictly speaking I don't think any ICC panels have been formed yet (not that I would know for sure), but I think of the process as having begun.

On the list of pending cases: http://www.iccwbo.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=19327354883

.AMAZON (Application ID: 1-1315-58086) ...................................................................................................... 22

.PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) .................................................................................................. 15
.PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) .................................................................................................. 26
.PATAGONIA (Application ID: 1-1084-78254) ................................................................................................ 134

I think them calling it a pending case mens it is in the process.


avri



On 13 May 2013, at 22:05, Milton L Mueller wrote:

> Good point, Jorge, I think what Avri meant was that an objection to those strings had been lodged. Avri, can you clarify quickly? 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf
>> Of Jorge Amodio
>> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 3:54 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] GAC comments - and a note on support for
>> diversity of views in our community
>> 
>> Forgive my ignorance or I may have missed something but I don't think that
>> there is any string from the first new gTLD batch in the "dispute resolution"
>> stage yet, afaik that comes after the evaluation results, isn't it ?
>> 
>> -Jorge
>> 
>> On May 13, 2013, at 1:06 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>>> Folks:
>>> 
>>> The edited version of the draft is at:
>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1d6GT0zqLjU6e7Js-TE2Gjlm_-
>> B5xvhE5CrRPZSV3oV4/edit
>>> 
>>> As a compromise to the few objections on the earlier drafts, the current
>> version states it does not take a position on the amazon and patagonia
>> applications.  (Remember we are not commenting on individual applications
>> in this stmt, we are commenting on GAC process).
>>> 
>>> The deadline for NCSG filing these comments is tomorrow so I will be filing
>> them in 24 hours unless there are any other strong objections.   Thanks to
>> Milton and others for all the redrafting and compromising to get a statement
>> we can submit as a group.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thank you,
>>> Robin
>>> 
>