Dear Tapani,

does this mean that the team of WS1 has nominated itself to 
automatically continue to be the formal vehicle for WS2? With the same 
gourd of members/participants? Is the CNSG going to discuss this at some 
point?

Thanks

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
Forwarded message:

> From: Mathieu Weill <[log in to unmask]>
> To: CCWG Accountability <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] TR: Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for 
> CCWG Accountability
> Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 11:15:16 +0100 (CET)
>
> FYI, this letter was sent in accordance with our discussions on 
> Friday.
>
>
>
> Best
>
> Mathieu
>
>
>
> De : Mathieu Weill [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Envoyé : dimanche 6 mars 2016 10:15
> À : 'James M. Bladel'; 'Thomas Schneider'; 'Alan Greenberg'; 'Byron
> Holland'; 'Patrik Fältström'; 'Louie Lee'; [log in to unmask]
> Cc : 'Lise Fuhr'; 'Jonathan Robinson'; 'León Felipe Sánchez Ambía';
> 'Thomas Rickert'; 'Mathieu Weill'; 'Theresa Swinehart'; 'Fadi 
> Chehade';
> 'Steve Crocker'; 'Tom Dale'; 'ACCT-Staff'; 'ICANN At-Large Staff'; 
> 'Bart
> Boswinkel'; 'Olof Nordling'; 'David Olive';
> [log in to unmask]; 'Carlos Reyes'; 'Julia Charvolen';
> 'Kimberly Carlson'; 'Julie Hedlund'
> Objet : Implementation and Work Stream 2 role for CCWG Accountability
>
>
>
> Dear Chartering Organizations,
>
>
>
> Since sending you our Work Stream 1 report on 23 February, we have 
> started
> discussions around Work Stream 1 implementation oversight and scoping 
> for
> Work Stream 2. In fact, this was the particular focus of our 
> Face-to-Face
> meeting on Friday, 4 March, and will also be the focus of our working
> session on Thursday morning.
>
>
>
> Implementation oversight role is not specifically detailed in our 
> Charter,
> but it is the CCWG-Accountability’s view that the group’s role in
> implementation is to ensure that the implementation is consistent with 
> the
> Work Stream 1 report, and furthermore to provide input on the
> implementation work when required by staff working on the 
> implementation,
> or, if, and when necessary to bring the work back in line with the 
> intent
> of the Work Stream 1 report.
>
>
>
> Since we expect the CCWG-Accountability to continue in its current 
> form to
> work through Work Stream 2, the most logical option is to have the 
> working
> group continue in its current form and with the responsibility to 
> monitor
> the implementation and provide input where needed. Of course, this
> responsibility would include regular updates to the Chartering
> Organizations via the appointed members as well as consultations with 
> the
> Chartering Organizations should issues be identified that are deemed
> without this specific remit.
>
>
>
> We note that, as an example of precedence, while the CWG-Stewardship 
> Final
> Proposal was submitted in June 2015, the CWG-Stewardship has remained
> active and therefore available when needed to answer questions from 
> the
> ICG, or to monitor the CCWG-Accountability dependencies, and to 
> coordinate
> with the other operational communities on shared issues such as IANA
> intellectual property rights.
>
>
>
> As the CCWG-Accountability Charter does not specifically address
> implementation, we would like to ensure that the 
> CCWG-Accountability’s
> proposed approach in relation to implementation is not inconsistent 
> with
> the intent of the Chartering Organizations concerning the scope and 
> role
> of the CCWG-Accountability. We therefore propose to proceed to oversee 
> the
> implementation work as described above unless there are objections 
> from
> one or more Chartering Organizations.
>
>
>
> We would like to emphasize that the CCWG-Accountability will remain 
> open
> to anyone who wishes to join, and we will welcome informed individuals
> with relevant implementation and operational experience to join the
> CCWG-Accountability in this next phase. We will put out a call for
> volunteers as we frame Work Stream 2 areas. Finally, we are conscious 
> of
> the heavy workload the CCWG-Accountability has been for your appointed
> members, and we would like to offer that Chartering Organizations use 
> this
> interim phase to re-confirm member participation, and appoint new
> replacement members if necessary.
>
>
>
> Thank you for your consideration,
>
>
>
> Leon Sanchez, Thomas Rickert, and Mathieu Weill
>
> CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs
>
> _______________________________________________
> Accountability-Cross-Community mailing list
> [log in to unmask]
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/accountability-cross-community