hi,

as requested:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GGHDeu4GptK-QUo7qdBBiVXMzHSEZrR1doEbltmsddU/edit?usp=sharing

the conversion put the draft imprint in foreground so they need to be
deleted on any page you want to comment.

i have deleted some of the.

avri

On 20-Jun-15 10:14, Stephanie Perrin wrote:
> I am marking up with sticky notes, as I do not have edit capability
> for PDFs on my laptop.  Hope this will be helpful, I will include all
> the relevant bits from my dissenting report as I understand that they
> have been omitted.  A google doc actually might be more helpful here,
> or some other kind of pad, if we can convert from the PDF to that
> format, as it is 62 pages and it is really important we get our points
> in as early as possible.
> kind regards,
> stephanie perrin
>
> On 2015-06-17 18:02, Avri Doria wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> I am just reading this now.
>>
>> Let me know of anything in the next days.
>>
>> Just to make sure that people understand this is just a draft of the
>> preliminary issues report.  that will come next - at which point we can
>> submit formal comments.  At this point I will just be reviewing it as
>> part of the process team.
>>
>> avri
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject:     [EWG-Process-WG] Draft Preliminary Issue Report
>> Date:     Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:59:09 -0600
>> From:     Lisa Phifer <[log in to unmask]>
>> To:     [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Attached please find a DRAFT of a new Preliminary Issue Report for your
>> review.
>>
>> As requested, staff has prepared this new draft to replace the original
>> Preliminary Issue Report published in March 2013. This new draft:
>>
>> * incorporates by reference further work and correspondence on this
>> topic over the past two years;
>>
>> * includes overviews of the EWG's outputs and Final Report (Section 3.6)
>> and the EP-WG's Process Framework (Section 3.7);
>>
>> * frames the issue addressed by this PDP to reflect the 26 May 2015
>> Board resolution (Section 3.5) and your framework adopted by that
>> resolution; and
>>
>> * discusses that issue (Section 4) by identifying questions,
>> available/needed inputs, and phased outputs, based on the EP-WG's
>> Process Framework.
>>
>> As agreed, this DRAFT is now being sent to EP-WG members to preview the
>> Preliminary Issue Report before it is posted for public comment, to
>> ensure that your framework (2 April 2015) has been properly reflected.
>>
>> *Please raise any errors or omissions spotted during your preview of
>> this DRAFT to the EP-WG list no later than 26 June.*
>>
>> Note that staff is also drafting a proposed PDP WG charter in parallel
>> with your Issue Report preview. Any edits resulting from this EP-WG
>> preview will be folded into the body of the Preliminary Issue Report and
>> proposed charter.
>>
>> We expect to post the Preliminary Issue Report (including proposed
>> charter) for public comment following your preview.
>>
>> In addition, after the public comment period, EP-WG members will have an
>> opportunity to review public comments and recommend any needed changes
>> to the framework.
>>
>> Staff (Marika and Margie) are also available in BA next week to discuss
>> any questions or concerns.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Lisa
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
>


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus