Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:01:50 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Thanks McTim,
I’ve replaced “more study of Whois privacy and proxy abuse should be conducted” with “more Whois privacy and proxy abuse research should be conducted” in the last paragraph. I hope that’s what you were referring to.
Thanks again.
Amr
On Nov 11, 2013, at 1:27 PM, McTim <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Amr Elsadr <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’ve taken a stab at drafting a comment on the ICANN Whois Privacy & Proxy
>> Abuse Study. The public comment period is over, but we have until November
>> 13th to submit a statement during the reply period. At this point, I would
>> like to know if members of the NCSG as well as the policy committee are
>> willing to endorse this statement, and whether or not there are any
>> suggested changes anyone feels need to be made.
>>
>> I’ve drafted the statement on a Google doc, which you can find here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RS5Ze_0TU4ymdq0N8tROKrr2Vg-SpBp5ZEXTLUr7j84/edit?usp=sharing
>
>
>
> Instead of "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse should be conducted"
>
> I think you need to add the word "research" so it becomes:
>
> "Whois privacy and proxy service abuse research should be conducted"
>
>
> Then it is fine by me.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel
|
|
|