Sorry, I meant ICG proposal of course. Thanks for the corrections off-list!

On 05/25/2016 05:20 PM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> I think this is a very weird use of the IETF slogan. The code (IANA
> functions) is running, and was running, and will be running. That is why
> the CSG proposal was easier than the CCWG proposal.
> 
> 
> On 05/25/2016 04:40 PM, David Post wrote:
>> But the other hals of the old IETF equation is critical, too:  "Running
>> Code."  Having arrived at consensus is no guarantee that the system will
>> actually work as planned.  Nobody knows if this code will run smoothly
>> or not, and it seems perfectly sensible to say we should find that out
>> before we adopt it.  Of course, delay has costs - but it has the very
>> significant advantage that it is not irrevocable.
> 

-- 
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9