+1 - anyone wants to redraft?
On 06/02/2016 04:57 AM, Dorothy K. Gordon wrote:
> Yes, a good start but with potentially unfortunate unintended consequences unless all of the elements raised; definition of terms, penalties, specifics for conference environments etc. are addressed.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Wisdom Donkor" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 1, 2016 10:30:16 PM
> Subject: Re: Public Comments - Revisions to ICANN Expected Standards of Behaviors
>
> +1 to Avri
>
> On Wednesday, June 1, 2016, Cheryl Langdon-Orr < [log in to unmask] > wrote:
>> I also agree with Avri on this matter...
>>
>> On 2 Jun 2016 6:49 am, "Tatiana Tropina" < [log in to unmask] > wrote:
>>
>> + 1 to Avri,
>> I think this is my problem with this public comment draft (and I left several comments about this in the doc). We do need more, but some of the issues require more time for elaboration. I don't think we can criticise ICANN for the fact that we haven't got more yet, when the document we are commenting on says that the work is in progress.
>> So agree with the positive comment that will say that it's good start but there is definitely an important work to be done further.
>> Cheers
>> Tanya
>> On 1 June 2016 at 19:24, avri doria < [log in to unmask] > wrote:
>>>
>>> On 31-May-16 15:58, Mueller, Milton L wrote:
>>>> From what I can read, I would not support the proposed policy.
>>>
>>> I find myself agreeing with the comment that we will eventually need
>>> something more.
>>> And I think that RFC7704 is a good model.
>>>
>>> But I think getting into that issue before we resolve wider
>>> accountability issues WS2 (e.g. ombudsman, or SOAC accountabity) of the
>>> CCWG-Accountabity is impracticable. I would suggest a statement that
>>> said good start, lets go with this for now, and determine after WS2,
>>> perhaps in next ATRT, whether more needs to be done. Some element of the
>>> issue could probably also feed into WS2 work.
>>>
>>> avri
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>>
>
--
Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital
Article 19
www.article19.org
PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
|