Thank you Farzanesh for updates and I will be in meeting.

Regards 
Bikram Shrestha 
President 
Internet Society Nepal

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 31, 2016, at 8:11 PM, GZ Kabir <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 
> 1+ for Farzaneh.
> 
> —Kabir
> 
> 
>> On Oct 31, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> 1+ for Farzaneh. 
>> 
>> I will not come to Hyderabad. For the CCWG-IG session on UN bodies I would recommend to have a look also into the G 20. The Hangzhou document (September 2016) is not bad (http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2016/160905-digital.html). On December 1, 2016, Germany will take over the G 20 presidency. They plan to have a special IT ministerial meeting early April 2017 in Düsseldorf with a multistakeholder pre-conference. 
>> 
>> The G 20 summit is in Hamburg, May 2017.
>> 
>> Wolfgang
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>> Von: NCSG-Discuss im Auftrag von farzaneh badii
>> Gesendet: Mo 31.10.2016 06:44
>> An: [log in to unmask]
>> Betreff: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: Update on CCWG-IG
>> 
>> Hello everybody
>> 
>> Here is an update on the ccwg-IG group in which I represent NCSG.
>> 
>> *A statement:* CCWG-IG recently drafted a statement which related to
>> proposals currently being discussed at the World Telecommunications
>> Standardization (WTSA 16).
>> 
>> CCWG-IG wrote the statement in response to a proposal by the African
>> Telecommunication Union regarding the use of geographic names in generic to
>> level domains. The objective of the statement was to remind WTSA
>> participants that matters regarding geographic domain names is within ICANN
>> mission and it is to be resolved in a bottom-up manner. The statement was
>> sent to chartering organizations.
>> I also took part in drafting the statement and made some comments. It is
>> attached.
>> 
>> *F2F meeting in Hyderabad : *CCWG-IG will have an F2F meeting in Hyderabad.
>> It will meet with the Board IG WG. It will also discuss CCWG-IG activities
>> and perhaps invites GNSO Council chair to discuss some matters.
>> 
>> *High-interest session of CCWG-IG: *The high-interest session will have two
>> segments, one segment focuses on Internet fragmentation, the other focuses
>> on various Internet governance related groups at the United Nations.
>> 
>> 
>> *The ccwg-IG and GNSO Council: * As it has been brought up on the NCSG
>> list, GNSO Council has a motion to withdraw from CCWG-IG. This is in light
>> of the current uniform framework for CCWG life cycles which GNSO Council
>> has approved. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/
>> ccwg-framework-principles-draft-19feb16-en.pdf
>> 
>> If you look at the principles, the CCWG-IG charter does not fit the
>> recommendations and principles, one reason is that  its mandate is based on
>> a continuous mission not a one off mission.What we need to do is to perhaps
>> change the CCWG-IG charter and implement it better, and make the group
>> focus on certain issues throughout the year as well as having F2F meetings
>> and high interest panels.
>> 
>> 
>> I hope this is helpful. Please look at ICANN schedule o find out the timing
>> of the CCWG-IG sessions.
>> 
>> Best
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Farzaneh
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Farzaneh