On 25-08-17 17:44, Stephanie Perrin wrote:

> Progress in the working group is slow. 

Indeed. But it is interesting to note that while most WGs
are suffering from lack of volunteers, this one seems
very popular - and people were very much obsessed by the
conflict of interest issues (as in wondering if they were
affected by them or not).

> I am not sympathetic to that request, I think it is a
> bad and unethical accounting practice to treat these funds as a kind of
> slush fund.

I agree.

	Julf