Deserves support. Highly recommended. Has NCUC not previously supported non domain issues that are internet related? 
RgdsGrace

Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 13:48:21 -0400
From: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign
To: [log in to unmask]

Yes , +1 and Definitely!
This is a good initiative worthy of our support!
regards
Karel
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Agreed.



Thanks,

Robin



> On Apr 20, 2016, at 9:57 AM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>

> @Milton +1

>

>

> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

> +506 8837 7176

> Skype: carlos.raulg

> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)

> On 20 Apr 2016, at 10:42, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

>

>> I agree, NCUC/NCSG are appropriate vehicles for publicizing these initiatives among civil society organizations/individuals, and many of its members may be interested in joining in, but #Internet4All does not seem to be a domain name policy issue and I think we had better stick to our basic mission.

>>

>> --MM

>>

>>> -----Original Message-----

>>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of

>>> James Gannon

>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2016 12:26 PM

>>> To: [log in to unmask]

>>> Subject: Re: Invitation to join the #Internet4All campaign

>>>

>>> Just on this point I hope that as this seems to be an infrastructure related

>>> campaign.

>>>

>>> Still reading about it at the moment but my gut reaction is that this may be

>>> more appropriate for individual NCUC members and organisations to

>>> endorse?

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> On 20/04/2016, 17:12, "NCSG-Discuss on behalf of Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G."

>>> <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:

>>>

>>>> Is ICANN (regional) staff participating in this activity? Could also be

>>>> part of the information we may need for a qualified opinion.

>>>>

>