NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 12 Oct 2012 02:17:25 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1150 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Amr,
The important thing is for us to make it clear that this is a positive thing for ICANN and the diversity of its GNSO CSG rather than a negative thing (NCSG wants to "keep them out"). It is a great thing that a cybercafé organization wants to get involved. It is just that the CSG is doing a political manipulation game. Basically you have the same US and European people running the show there for the last 13 years. Literally, the same small group. They think they should be exempt from opening up to new constituencies, because it allows this small group to stay in control. This is just not right. I hope we can avoid turning this application into a political football. It seems so obvious to me that they belong in CSG - but explaining why they came to us bares the soul of some of the worst aspects of ICANN politics


From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Amr Elsadr
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 7:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [NCSG-Discuss] Application For New GNSO Constituency in The NCSG -- PIA-CC

Thanks for the clarification, Milton. Point taken. I stand corrected.

Amr



ATOM RSS1 RSS2