for your comment, please read.

--- Denise Michel <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:32:13 +0100
> From: Denise Michel <[log in to unmask]>
> To: GNSO Council <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: [Fwd: [council] Summary of LSE constituency input]
> 
> Following-up on Bruce's request -- would you please send your 
> constituency's edits to the attached chart to the GNSO Secretariat 
> <[log in to unmask]> by Friday, 2 March.  Please let
> Glen 
> know if you need more time.
> 
> Again, this chart will be used to inform the Board Governance
> Committee 
> and will help form a basis for selecting a few recommendations
> relating 
> to major structural issues for public discussion in Lisbon.  We are
> 
> scheduling a public forum on Monday in Lisbon to discuss GNSO
> Improvements.
> 
> Thanks.
> Denise
> 
> Denise Michel
> Vice President, Policy Development
> ICANN   www.icann.org
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> 
> 
> Hello All,
> 
> I asked the staff to summarise the views of each of the
> constituencies
> on the LSE report.
> 
> Each recommendation is ranked in terms of level of support for the
> recommendation, and priority for implementing the recommendation.
> 
> The rankings are high, medium, low.
> 
> This draft table has been prepared based on the inputs to the
> public
> forum.
> 
> The recommendations have also been broken into the following
> categories:
> 
> - participation
> 
> - rules
> 
> - structure
> 
> - tools-support
> 
> - working procedures
> 
> Please review and advise ICANN staff of any corrections.
> 
> The purpose of this document will be to help inform the Board
> Governance
> Committee and also form a basis for selecting a few recommendations
> (such as recommendation 19) for public discussion in Lisbon.   The
> aim
> is to focus discuss on major structural issues in Lisbon, rather
> than
> debate whether the website could be better.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>