NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Apr 2012 17:01:03 +0200
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: April 10 Board meeting
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=UTF-8
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Hi,

What's to discuss?
We presented arguments.
And they were heard.

Avri

Milton L Mueller <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>I am surprised there is not more discussion of these resolutions on
>this list.
>The good news is that in both cases, the board’s action coincides with
>NCSG positions, and in the case of the second resolution, I think our
>work played a role in making the decision.
>
>My analysis of the board resolutions here:
>http://www.internetgovernance.org/2012/04/14/when-no-action-is-the-wisest-action-icann-does-good/
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2