NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Date:
Tue, 3 Apr 2007 23:45:41 -0400
Content-Disposition:
inline
Reply-To:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: [Expression] [governance] ICANN Board Vote Signals Era of Censorship in Domain Names
From:
Milton Mueller <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
[log in to unmask], [log in to unmask]
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
Andrew:
Your distinction is arbitrary. 
Why is a top level domain different from a second level domain in this
regard? 

>>> "Andrew McLaughlin" <[log in to unmask]> 04/03/07 8:41 PM >>>
content-specific label, and therefore bad (IMHO).  DNS registries
should always be agnostic to content.

My concern is to keep all DNS registries away from the business of
acting as a label for content;  it's fine with me if they serve as a

ATOM RSS1 RSS2