NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Date:
Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:16:00 -0400
Reply-To:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Hi,

I happily find myself in a centrist postion on this topic.

One reason we do not have long list of blocked words is that we could never build an adequate list.
Unfortunately too many names were put in a Blocked Geo names list but that is another story.

The point was that anyone who had a particular problem with any name for any reason, could file an objection.  I don't need to agree with or understand their objection.  I think it is great that people are objecting because that is the way it is supposed to work.

And while the staff did not design the Objection process quite as I would have with a chance to alter the applied for name, at least they do allow for discussions and mediation between the objector and the objectee before going to dispute resolution by the ICC panel.

avri

ATOM RSS1 RSS2