NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
Date:
Mon, 16 Apr 2007 06:02:33 -0700
Reply-To:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Danny Younger <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Re:  Why is there a difference between the .com and
.net charges when they are run by the same company and
would presumably have the same cost structure?

A bit of history... ICANN approved the .net contract
with Verisign that contained major changes from the
draft .net agreement posted on the ICANN website,
without ANY public consultation -- see
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/registrars/msg03117.html

This contract served as the template for .org, .info,
and .biz that set annual registration fee increases at
10%.  The .com agreement was set at a slighter lower
annual increase (around 7%) because the Board didn't
think that they could get away with a full 10%
increase.

As it stands, if .cn can charge one yuan (18 cents)
for a domain registration, it rapidly becomes
apparently that actual registration costs are going
way down (owing to economies of scale and other
considerations) and that price increases are
"justified" only to the extent that they serve to
raise additional funds for ICANN (corporate
self-interest continuing to trump the public
interest).





__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2