NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Non-Commercial User Constituency <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:47:53 -0700
Reply-To:
Edward Hasbrouck <[log in to unmask]>
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
Re: Adopted Board Resolutions | Nairobi
From:
Edward Hasbrouck <[log in to unmask]>
X-cc:
Joly MacFie <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Organization:
The Practical Nomad
MIME-Version:
1.0
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines) 
As I pointed out in my comments to the Public Forum, the issue is not just 
"yes or no on .XXX", but that ICANN didn't follow its own rules.

The Public Forum transcript hasn't been posted yet by ICANN, but I have 
posted my comments here:

http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001842.html

Dealing with this requires a policy development process, not just 
"reconsideration" of the substantive decision on .XXX:

http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001843.html

I've also posted ICANN's "responses" to my requests, whihc thye also 
haven't posted -- in which they admit that they have no policies for 
independent review -- here:

http://hasbrouck.org/blog/archives/001846.html




----------------
Edward Hasbrouck
<[log in to unmask]>
<http://hasbrouck.org>
+1-415-824-0214

ATOM RSS1 RSS2