NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rafik Dammak <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 4 Oct 2011 22:46:29 +0900
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1060 bytes) , text/html (1492 bytes)
hello,

if it is just one issue , it will be making NCSG more strong, more louder
and being present and visible in all working groups, drafting team and so
on, participating in all public comments in order to influence the policy
making and stating our official positions, BUT also to be more effective
with coordinating efforts with different stakeholders group and
constituencies on issues that we have common ground with them. NCSG
succeeded to advance some topic like for making new gTLD program inclusive
with JAS work and should keep doing the same thing with other issues.
it is the point which provide the means and platform  to solve the other
issues.

Rafik


2011/9/30 Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]>

> As I have not been able to get a conference call scheduled yet, I am
> starting the question process.  I suggest that all candidates answer all
> questions.  I suggest that they feel free to debate among themselves and
> with the members of the NCSG.
>
> Thanks
>
> Avri
>
> Question 3: What do you foresee as the most important issue for the NCSG
> during the next year.  2 years?


ATOM RSS1 RSS2