NCSG-DISCUSS Archives

NCSG-Discuss

NCSG-DISCUSS@LISTSERV.SYR.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Wisdom Donkor <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Wisdom Donkor <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:22:09 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (2399 bytes) , text/html (4 kB)
Dear Tapani,

I add my voice to Seun and Edward. I think the board should be prepare for
any questions at any given time.
On this note, i will prefer the letter.

Cheers.

*WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)*
ICANN Fellow / ISOC Member, IGF Member, Diplo Foundation
OGP Working Group Member, Africa OD Working Group Member
E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist
National Information Technology Agency (NITA)
Ghana Open Data Initiative (GODI)
Post Office Box CT. 2439, Cantonments, Accra, Ghana
Tel; +233 20 812881
Email: [log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
[log in to unmask]
Skype: wisdom_dk
facebook: facebook@wisdom_dk
Website: www.nita.gov.gh / www.data.gov.gh
www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:42 AM, Edward Morris <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Hi Tapani,
>
>
> I think this is wrong.
>
> It just gives them time to come up with justifications for some of their
> improprieties.
>
> For example, I want them to justify their action in the CCWG last week
> where they ignored our timeline, process, Charter and pretty much every
> procedural nicety to put us in crisis mode and threaten the transition. If
> Markus is there I want him to justify, as our appointee, siding with the
> Board on all votes that this mess created last Tuesday and point blank ask
> him why we should reappoint someone so out of touch with the NCSG (with one
> exception).
>
> I guess we could label that as questions bout the Board's relations with
> the CCWG and intent regarding the transition.
>
> I'd be interested in their response to questions about retainment of The
> Analysis Group and why the bottom up process seems to be under threat by
> ICANN retaining more and more "experts".
>
> I guess that's two topics.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: "Tapani Tarvainen" <[log in to unmask]>
> *Sent*: Friday, February 26, 2016 11:12 AM
> *To*: [log in to unmask]
> *Subject*: Questions to the Board?
>
> Dear all,
>
> One regular event at ICANN meetings is that we get to meet the Board,
> talk with them about and ask them whatever we want.
>
> The Board would, however, like to know in advance what we're going
> to ask them, so they could better prepare for it.
>
> If you have suggestions for topics for our meeting with the Board in
> Marrakech, please let me know as soon as possible (feel free to post
> to the list or me directly, as you prefer).
>
> Thank you,
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
>


ATOM RSS1 RSS2