+1

Hakikur

At 13:45 05-09-2013, Nicolas Adam wrote:
>+1
>
>Nicolas
>
>On 05/09/2013 6:50 AM, Amr Elsadr wrote:
>>Thanks Avri. I'm happy with all three statements and the addition 
>>you suggested.
>>
>>Thanks again.
>>
>>Amr
>>
>>On Sep 5, 2013, at 6:42 AM, Avri Doria <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>The reply period for the delay of the GNSO proposal ends on 6 
>>>June.  At todays' meeting there was a strong sentiment in favor of 
>>>NCSG endorsing the NPOC statement.
>>>
>>>What do people think about the following?
>>>
>>>I will ask the NCSG Policy  Committee to decide by  6 September 
>>>whether they beleive this should be submitted in the NCSG's name.
>>>
>>>Please comment.
>>>Any objections?
>>>Any edits?
>>>
>>>-----
>>>
>>>
>>>NCSG wishes to support and endorse the statement submitted by NPOC 
>>><http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00003.html> 
>>>against any delay in the beginning the next cycle of GNSO reviews.
>>>
>>>The NCSG also support comments submitted by:
>>>
>>>- ISPCP 
>>><http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00002.html>
>>>- Google 
>>><http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-gnso-review-15jul13/msg00001.html>
>>>
>>>against any delay in the beginning of the next cyle of GNSO reviews.
>>>
>>>The NCSG wishes to add the following comments to this Reply:
>>>
>>>We beleive that with the ATRT2 to publish its report by the end of 
>>>2013, the timing is perfect for the process to begin early in 2014 
>>>without any further delay.
>>>
>>>
>>>-----
>>>
>>>I can't take complete silence as consent.  silence only works as 
>>>consent when other people are being noisy.
>>>
>>>so please say something
>>>
>>>avri