Thanks, Danny,

I appreciate especially the two paragraphs of your mail which I leave here.

Norbert Klein

=

Danny Younger wrote:
> Having read the PIR proposal as put forward to Tina
> Dam, I have a number of preliminary concerns:
>
>
> 3.  This proposal was tendered over three months ago
> (15 May 2006) and ICANN has yet to provide an initial
> response to the proposal.  It would be nice to know
> why there has been such a delay, why ICANN failed to
> post this proposal in their Correspondence section of
> the website, and why this proposal was not mentioned
> at all at the Marrakech Domain Name Marketplace
> Workshop in which PIR's David Maher was a panelist. 
> It would also be nice to know why the language of this
> proposal was not included in the 27 June 2006 proposed
> .org registry agreement and is only now being brought
> to the attention of the NCUC.
>
> 4.  Establishing a policy to deal with the 5 day Add
> Grace period is rightfully the province of the GNSO
> whose PDP on Contractual Conditions could readily deal
> with this issue.  We should not be acting to support a
> registry initiative to the detriment of ICANN's
> policy-recommending body.  
>